FinOps Cloud Express
Identify Cloud spend to explain and optimizations to prioritize.
- Cost breakdown for the selected scope
- Ranked opportunities
- Measurement plan
A rising bill, repeated 403 errors or blocked deployments call for a precise scope of work, not a list of technologies.
Packaged engagements, from focused audits to operational pilots, scoped directly with the founder around your technical challenge.
Each service explains the systems examined, inputs required and deliverables. Choose according to the challenge; engagement conditions are set during scoping.
AKITA / Services
Choose according to the symptom, decision and expected deliverables: diagnosis, audit, architecture, pilot or intervention.
Identify Cloud spend to explain and optimizations to prioritize.
Select a few costly jobs with the Data team, test relevant SQL changes and compare results, duration and cost before any production rollout.
Identify legitimate 403 responses before changing WAF rules.
Prioritize verified Azure security gaps with the responsible teams.
Find the cause of a Kubernetes incident and prioritize an authorized fix.
Configure an authorized pilot domain, verify DNS, routing and TLS, and document the cutover decision without changing the live domain by default.
Identify delivery blockers on representative pipelines.
Make a Cloud decision based on documented dependencies and risks.
Bring governed foundation prerequisites together around a pilot application and prepare a migration that can be decided and tested.
Build a shared template or framework, validate it on a pilot repository and hand over adoption guidance to the teams.
Decide whether a generative AI use case warrants a controlled pilot.
Identify avoidable spend or optimize jobs without applying one gain to the whole bill.
Diagnose a block, security risk or fragile delivery process before changing production.
Decide on architecture, secure a migration or validate a first pilot.
I start by establishing the facts in a diagnosis or audit. I carry out remediation or a pilot only when its scope and access have been agreed.
I scope the problem with you: affected systems, available access and the decision required.
I examine the evidence and perform the agreed work; production changes require explicit authorization.
I hand over findings, usable deliverables and prioritized options for action.
The founder’s background spans architecture, development, automation and production; he scopes each engagement with you directly, without a sales layer.
Cloud, networking, security, applications and data: decisions consider the whole system.
From architecture through code and automation to production: recommendations informed by real engineering.
Defined objectives, usable deliverables and solutions adapted to the constraints of each environment.
Start with the decision: understand spend, resolve an incident or prepare a transformation. An initial discussion defines the service and systems involved.
Not necessarily. An assessment can start with read-only data and access. Production changes are separately defined and authorized.
No, unless explicitly agreed in scope. An audit delivers a diagnosis and priorities; a fix or pilot needs a separate agreement.
Yes. Depending on the environment, scope can include Azure, AWS and GCP, subject to available access and the question being addressed.