A Policy alert has no decision owner
Connect a flagged resource to its application, owner and any exception rather than merely counting non-compliant alerts.
Cloud Security Assessment: qualify Azure gaps
Azure Policy alerts, inherited roles and suspected public access pile up without showing what truly exposes applications.
Examine agreed resources and rank gaps by usage, risk and the person authorized to decide.
Services
Problems addressed
An RBAC role appears too broad
Check identity, scope and deployment dependencies before recommending a reduction that could interrupt service.
A supposedly private service seems exposed
Compare configuration and observed access from authorized test origins; the presence of a private endpoint is not conclusive.
What you receive
- Gap registerObserved configuration or exposure, evidence source, affected application, owner and matters still to verify.
- Remediation prioritiesRisk, potential service impact, approver and checks needed after a separate correction.
Scope and prerequisites
Scope and access. Selected applications, subscriptions and policies, exports or Azure read access, and platform and security contacts. Active access tests require agreed origins and permissions.
Boundaries. No tenant certification, penetration test, secret access or automatic changes to permissions or networking.
A question about your environment? Tell me about it: I'll define a useful scope with you before starting.
Contact me